Our criminal defense lawyers knowledgeable in firearm cases were able to prevent our client, a federal law enforcement officer, from being arrested and charged when he shot and killed a fellow officer with a semiautomatic hand gun.

Our experienced criminal defense attorneys were able to convince state prosecutors to refrain from filing any charges against the main alleged accomplice in a first-degree murder case.

Our criminal defense lawyers successfully represented a lawyer who was charged with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon. Through our efforts, we were able to convince the prosecutor to drop the charges after our client was arrested and booked in jail, and before his arraignment.

In a Federal mortgage fraud prosecution, our conspiracy defense attorneys were able to keep two of our clients who were charged as co-defendants from being sentenced to prison in spite of overwhelming evidence of guilt. Our federal defense lawyers convinced the Federal District Judge that sentences of probation were appropriate even though the federal sentencing guidelines recommended time in custody.

Our criminal defense lawyers secured a Not Guilty verdict for our client in a DUI case in which the chief DUI law enforcement officer of the county testified that our client was intoxicated and that he failed all the roadside tests. Our criminal defense attorneys cross-examined the lead officer and actually had him attempt to perform the roadside exercises. He failed miserably and we were able to convince the judge that the roadside tests were unfair and almost impossible for anyone to pass including persons with no disabilities and who had consumed no alcohol.

Our felony criminal defense lawyers were able to prevent a conviction of a juvenile who was accused of making threats to shoot at a school.

Our sex crime lawyers were able to prevent charges against our clients when they were alleged to have nonconsensual sexual contact with an underage schoolmate.

Our federal criminal defense attorneys secured a reversal of a conviction in the United States Court of Appeals after convincing the Chief Judge and the two other judges on the appellate panel that the district judge did not properly follow the law regarding the administering of Miranda warnings to our client.